Politics Done Right reveals how the media protect Netanyahu, defend billionaire wealth, and ignore stories the public urgently needs to hear.
Trump, Netanyahu, and SCOTUS
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
The embedded video contains solely the questions that WBAI’s We Decide’s Jenna Flanagan asked me. The entire panel discussion can be viewed here (Episode: 2026-05-11). We Decide is a joint Pacifica Affiliate, WBAI production, and the We Decide: America at the Crossroads with Jenna Flanagan.
Summary
On WBAI’s We Decide with Jenna Flanagan, the panel confronted three interconnected crises: the fragile U.S.-Iran peace negotiations, Israel’s continued bombardment of Lebanon, and the Supreme Court’s dangerous ruling in Louisiana v. Callais. Each story reveals how concentrated power operates. Governments prolong wars to preserve political advantage, while courts weaken democratic protections to entrench minority rule. Yet these reactionary moves carry the seeds of their own defeat. Demographic change, grassroots organizing, and a more informed electorate can transform today’s setbacks into tomorrow’s progressive victories.
- The Trump administration has multiple diplomatic exits from confrontation with Iran, but appears willing to use conflict for political theater.
- Israel’s attacks on Lebanon continue despite ceasefire efforts, reinforcing the argument that Netanyahu depends on perpetual war to maintain power.
- War drives up fuel prices, destabilizes global markets, and inflicts devastating humanitarian costs.
- The Supreme Court’s Louisiana v. Callais decision weakens one of the Voting Rights Act’s core protections against racial vote dilution.
- America’s increasingly multiracial electorate can dilute reactionary strongholds and ultimately elect more Democrats and progressive leaders.
The path forward is not despair but organizing. Authoritarian politics rely on fear, division, and voter suppression. Democracy advances when ordinary people reject cynicism, build coalitions, and insist that peace and justice are not negotiable.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
The same forces that undermine democracy at home often fuel instability abroad. That was the central truth that emerged during WBAI’s We Decide with Jenna Flanagan, where journalists examined the U.S.-Iran negotiations, Israel’s continuing attacks on Lebanon, and the Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais. These stories may appear unrelated, but they are all manifestations of a deeper problem: entrenched elites preserving power through militarism, division, and democratic erosion.
The latest developments in U.S.-Iran negotiations illustrate how political leaders frequently treat war as a tool of spectacle. Reports indicate that President Trump rejected Iran’s most recent peace proposal as “totally unacceptable,” even though his administration retains multiple avenues for de-escalation. During the panel, the argument was straightforward: if the White House truly wanted peace, it could seize one of several off-ramps already available.
That observation reflects a broader historical reality. War often benefits politically connected corporations, defense contractors, and opportunistic politicians while imposing crushing costs on ordinary people. Democratic accountability weakens when leaders exploit crises to consolidate authority. Meanwhile, every escalation in the Middle East threatens higher energy prices, food insecurity, and economic disruption.
The humanitarian consequences are even more devastating. Civilians in Iran, Lebanon, Gaza, and Israel bear the heaviest burden while political leaders trade rhetoric. Progressive politics rejects the cynical assumption that civilian suffering is an acceptable cost of geopolitical maneuvering.
The same logic applies to Israel’s continued bombardment of Lebanon. Despite a U.S.-brokered ceasefire, Israeli attacks have persisted, raising questions about whether Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu views war as a political necessity rather than a security response. Netanyahu faces profound domestic legal and political pressures. In that context, perpetual conflict can serve as a mechanism to postpone accountability and rally nationalist support.
The panel emphasized that mainstream media often fail to connect these attacks to broader questions of territorial ambition and displacement. When coverage isolates each bombing from the structural realities of occupation and settlement expansion, the public receives an incomplete picture. Progressive journalism insists on examining the systems of power that shape these outcomes.
At home, the Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais delivered a severe blow to voting rights. The Court invalidated Louisiana’s majority-Black congressional district, weakening Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and opening the door to new racial and partisan gerrymanders. Civil rights advocates rightly warned that the ruling threatens decades of progress won through extraordinary sacrifice.
Yet the decision may not produce the permanent victory that reactionaries expect.
America in 2026 is not America in 1965. The electorate is more diverse, younger, and increasingly resistant to overt racial appeals. Organizers have stronger digital tools, broader coalitions, and greater capacity to mobilize voters across race, class, and geography.
Political analysts have noted that attempts to stretch Republican districts deeper into competitive territory can backfire. When mapmakers dilute overwhelmingly conservative strongholds to capture additional seats, they often create more districts that become vulnerable in wave elections. In trying to maximize short-term advantage, they may unintentionally increase Democratic opportunities.
That possibility reflects a profound lesson. Reactionary forces can manipulate institutions, but they cannot permanently suppress demographic reality. A multiracial democracy is emerging, and no court ruling can halt that transformation indefinitely.
The broader connection between these stories is unmistakable. Whether through war abroad or voter suppression at home, concentrated power seeks to preserve itself by narrowing public participation and avoiding accountability.
The progressive response must be equally clear. Build independent media. Strengthen grassroots organizations. Defend voting rights. Demand diplomacy over militarism. Reject the politics of fear.
History repeatedly shows that ordinary people, when organized and informed, can defeat systems that appear immovable. The struggle for peace and democracy remains difficult, but it is winnable.
And that is precisely why those invested in war and minority rule are so afraid.
Independent Media needs you
If you like what we do, please do the following!
- Become Patreon here.
- SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube Channel here.
- SUBSCRIBE to our Facebook Page here.
- SUBSCRIBE to our Podcast here.
- Support our GoFundMe equipment fund here.
- Share our blogs, podcasts, and videos.
- Consider contributing here.