CNN/MSNBC Political Consultant & Former Fox News Pundit Julie Roginsky discusses the media’s dereliction of duty and fear in covering Trump.
Fmr. Fox News pundit Julie Roginsky discusses mainstream media.
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
Julie Roginsky warns that corporate-owned mainstream outlets helped normalize Donald Trump by smothering the electorate in uncritical coverage and then ducking accountability once the ratings bonanza curdled into constitutional peril.
- Les Moonves’s infamous line—“It’s damn good for CBS”—captures how profit incentives led networks to platform Trump nonstop.
- In 2016 Trump amassed 822 nightly-news minutes, more than any candidate in modern history, according to the Tyndall Report.
- A Harvard-CJR study shows a Breitbart-anchored ecosystem that set the broader media agenda and dragged legacy outlets rightward.
- Today Trump wields defamation suits—like his $10 billion action over a 60 Minutes edit—to stall Paramount’s sale to Skydance and intimidate reporters.
- Consolidation leaves news divisions tethered to conglomerates whose wider business interests invite presidential leverage and self-censorship.
Corporate media’s obeisance has real-world costs: it shields grift, stokes disinformation, and erodes democracy. A truly free press must choose civic duty over quarterly earnings.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Political consultant Julie Roginsky pointed out that corporate news executives did not stumble blindly into Trumpism; they engineered it. Moonves’s giddy admission that Trump “may not be good for America, but … is damn good for CBS” betrays a business model that monetizes outrage and trades journalistic rigor for advertising windfalls. That calculation shaped coverage long before politics professor Yochai Benkler’s team mapped a Breitbart-centric network flooding social media with hyper-partisan frames. Faced with an asymmetric right-wing propaganda machine, rather than doubling down on verification, legacy outlets chased the clicks—airing rallies live, flattening fact and spectacle, and gifting Trump what the Tyndall Report tallied as 822 minutes of free campaign advertising on nightly newscasts before Labor Day 2016.
Those editorial decisions birthed a feedback loop. Saturation coverage conferred legitimacy; legitimacy drew more eyeballs; eyeballs inflated revenue. When Trump’s bombast threatened norms, boards and shareholders shrugged. Their subsidiaries—from theme parks to broadband licenses—depended on regulatory goodwill that a vindictive president could withhold. The danger of this entanglement now stands bare. Paramount Global’s leadership has reportedly weighed an eight-figure settlement to make Trump’s $10 billion 60 Minutes lawsuit disappear, because federal regulators have slowed approval of the company’s $8 billion sale to Skydance Media until the president’s pique is appeased. latimes.com Extortion by lawsuit is no longer hypothetical; it is policy.
The chilling effect reaches newsrooms. Reporters know that a single hard-hitting segment can trigger antitrust headaches for their parent conglomerate or spark retaliatory tariffs against sister entertainment assets abroad. Editors pull punches; legal departments stall investigations; sensational but documented claims—from a former KGB officer alleging 1980s kompromat to whistle-blown evidence of Saudi pay-to-play—vanish from U.S. sites even while foreign editions keep them online. Roginsky, who once sparred with Tucker Carlson as Fox’s token liberal, now publishes on Substack precisely because independent platforms, for all their flaws, permit scrutiny the networks bury.
Progressives should see in this media-corporate nexus a textbook case of regulatory capture. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 loosened ownership caps; Wall Street’s relentless demand for scale bred behemoths whose silos—studio, streaming, cable, wireless—form a single point of presidential leverage. Journalism becomes just another cost center, expendable when profit threatens power. That consolidation explains why stories about Trump’s declining cognition or cavalier handling of classified intel receive less airtime than speculative pieces on Joe Biden’s age. “Trump being Trump” is not analysis; it is capitulation.
Yet the danger, Roginsky argues, extends beyond bad headlines. When rural hospitals shutter because Medicaid is gutted, local TV stations—often the only remaining news outlets—lose advertising from medical providers, further hollowing civic information. When tariffs inflate the price of school supplies, the same communities misled by cable cheerleading bear the inflationary brunt. Media malpractice thus compounds policy cruelty.
Repair demands structural reform. First, antitrust enforcement must treat cross-platform mergers as threats to democratic infrastructure, not mere market transactions. Second, a revived Fairness Doctrine adapted for the digital age could ensure that wall-to-wall live rallies come packaged with fact-checked context rather than running unchecked. Third, publicly funded, non-commercial journalism—modeled on Britain’s BBC or Germany’s ARD—should insulate critical reporting from shareholder intimidation. Lastly, progressive communicators must bypass gatekeepers: podcasts, cooperatively owned papers, and community radio can seed narratives that corporate giants ignore.
Julie Roginsky’s career arc—Fox foil, CNN analyst, indie columnist—mirrors the larger fight. The journalist who resists commodification can still speak truth, but she must cultivate audiences willing to support it directly. That reciprocal model, built on subscriptions not spectacle, offers a path toward a media ecosystem that serves the demos rather than the demagogue. Progressives should embrace and fund it, because democracy’s durability depends on a Fourth Estate that exposes power instead of catering to it.
