A discussion between Substackers Walter Rhein and Egberto Willies on prescient subjects: 1. The state of immigration, 2. Substack flirting with gentrification due to the influx of mainstream media.
The state of immigration and its implications.
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
Host Egberto Willies and guest Walter Rhein explore how the United States’ self-image as a land of opportunity collides with the lived realities of immigrants who confront racism, broken promises, and a byzantine citizenship process. Drawing on Rain’s rural upbringing, decade in Peru, and marriage to a Peruvian spouse, the pair critique American exceptionalism, the weaponization of anti-immigrant memes, and the erosion of civics education—then pivot to worries that Substack may be “gentrifying” as legacy figures crowd out grassroots voices.
- Immigration narratives mask deep injustices that crush newcomers’ hopes.
- American exceptionalism discourages an honest reckoning with genocide, slavery, and ongoing inequities.
- Social-media misinformation festers because schools no longer teach critical thinking or real history.
- The labor market and birth-rate crises show the U.S. needs immigrant workers, yet nativists scapegoat them.
- Substack risks replicating corporate-media gatekeeping if independent writers lose algorithmic visibility.
The conversation underscores that genuine patriotism demands truth-telling: America only fulfills its promise when it welcomes migrants, funds public education that teaches unvarnished history, and guards alternative media spaces from corporate capture.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
The intertwined stories of immigration and media reveal how power either expands or contracts the public square. Immigration keeps the United States demographically vibrant and economically dynamic, yet reactionary politicians cast newcomers as threats. Likewise, Substack began as a refuge for independent writers shut out of corporate newsrooms, but today marquee names and venture capital risk pricing grassroots voices off the stage. Examining both arenas clarifies how progressives can defend openness, pluralism, and shared prosperity.
Immigration: Facts That Outshine the Fear
The data dismantle the right-wing panic narrative. The Congressional Budget Office projects net immigration of roughly two million people in 2025, tapering toward a long-run average of 1.1 million a year—numbers that merely offset a historically low native-born birthrate and an aging workforce. Those arrivals already sustain nearly one-fifth of the labor market; in January 2025 immigrants held 31.7 million jobs—an 83 percent increase since 2000. Far from draining coffers, the CBO calculates that the recent immigration surge will reduce federal deficits by $900 billion over the next decade because new residents pay taxes and spur growth.
Regional economists confirm the macro benefits. A Dallas Fed study attributes a substantial share of 2024-25 employment and output gains to immigrant labor filling service, care-sector, and high-skill shortages that domestic workers cannot or will not meet. Brookings Institution researchers warn that if the United States tightens the border further, GDP growth could fall by half a percentage point—or roughly $130 billion—in 2025 alone. Simply put, the country is aging out of its productive prime; immigrants keep the lights on.
Yet nativist demagogues weaponize social-media memes faster than fact-checkers can respond. The anti-intellectual streak thrives because underfunded public schools de-emphasize civics and critical thinking, leaving many voters vulnerable to scapegoating. Progressives champion not only humane border policy—expanded asylum processing, a path to citizenship for essential workers, and family reunification—but also a New Deal-scale investment in public education that teaches honest history and media literacy. Knowledge inoculates against demagoguery.
The Moral and Political Stakes
Immigration policy doubles as a referendum on American identity. Will the republic honor its inscription at the Statue of Liberty or retreat into a fortress of nationalism? History offers sobering parallels: every era that blocked newcomers—from the Chinese Exclusion Act to the 1924 national-origins quotas—later paid an economic and moral price. Today, states that embrace immigrants post stronger job growth and higher median incomes than restrictionist counterparts. Moreover, immigrant-led households anchor rural communities hemorrhaging population; without them, many school districts and hospitals would shutter.
Politically, progressives recognize that solidarity beats division. The same corporate lobbies that lobby for tax loopholes bankroll anti-immigrant campaigns to keep working-class voters fighting over scraps instead of demanding fair wages and universal healthcare. A multiracial coalition that rejects the “good immigrant versus bad immigrant” trope can finally shift attention toward corporate profiteering and climate peril—the universal crises elites prefer to dodge.
Substack and the Specter of Media “Gentrification”
Media ecosystems mirror immigration debates: who gets voice, who gets crowded out? Substack’s founders pitched the platform as a radical alternative to hedge-fund-owned outlets. Five million paid subscriptions later, the company now hosts glossy parties in Washington and courts Beltway stars. Independent journalists worry that an influx of legacy names will raise subscription norms, push algorithmic favoritism toward big followings, and recreate the gatekeeping that drove writers to Substack in the first place. Long-time contributors warn bluntly that the site risks “gentrification”—a term borrowed from urban housing struggles to describe wealthier newcomers pricing out community builders.
Evidence for the trend mounts. Commentaries like The Journeyman note that recently laid-off newspaper columnists often arrive with corporate rolodexes and venture backing, quickly commanding home-page real estate and newsletter bundles. Even Substack co-founder Hamish McKenzie concedes the ecosystem is in “volatile transition,” insisting the platform will safeguard “courageous journalism.” Yet his own vision statement stresses scalability and “trusted brands,” language eerily reminiscent of legacy media consolidation.
Keeping the Door Open
Progressives defend Substack’s original pluralist promise by proposing cooperative governance: transparent discovery algorithms, and tiered revenue shares favoring smaller newsletters. A platform-managed solidarity fund could subsidize investigative work from marginalized communities, ensuring that immigration reporters from the Global South or labor beat writers from the Rust Belt are not drowned out by celebrity pundits. Readers can further democratize attention by intentionally subscribing across class and geography, echoing how welcoming immigrants strengthens—not weakens—civil society.
Conclusion
Immigration and media gentrification share a common denominator: concentrated power erects new walls just as fast as people tear them down. Migrants cross borders seeking dignity; independent journalists cross digital frontiers seeking voice. Reactionary forces try to slam both doors. The progressive task is to keep them open, armed with data, solidarity, and the conviction that diversity—of people and of ideas—is the engine of a just economy and a vibrant democracy.
