The mainstream media hyperventilates about Kamala Harris not speaking to America’s economic angst. Journalists Marlon Weems and Egberto Willies expose the inconvenient reality.
The Real Reason Kamala Harris Lost
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Marlon Weems and Egberto Willies dissect the multifaceted reasons behind Kamala Harris’s election loss, exploring racial, gender-based, and societal dynamics. The conversation features Marlon Weems, a progressive journalist, who provides critical insight into the broader implications of Harris’s defeat, framed within the political and cultural landscape of the United States.
Key Themes and Analysis:
- Racial and Gender Bias:
- The journalists in the video argue that systemic racial and gender prejudices were pivotal in Harris’s loss. Despite her qualifications as a former attorney general and vice president, Harris faced persistent stereotyping and character attacks, including being labeled “an empty suit” by critics. These labels were rooted more in bias than a substantive critique of her policies or achievements.
- Egberto and Marlon highlight the deep-seated discomfort in segments of American society with electing a Black and Asian-American woman to the highest office, suggesting that this bias reflects unresolved historical inequalities.
- Media Narratives and Perception:
- The media played a significant role in framing Harris’s public image. Conservative rhetoric, amplified by former President Trump, portrayed her as incompetent, a narrative that resonated with a substantial portion of the electorate. This perception overshadowed her policy proposals and her qualifications.
- The conversation also critiques progressive media outlets for failing to counter these narratives robustly, thus leaving Harris vulnerable to attacks.
- Electoral Dynamics:
- The men identify white women as the decisive swing voters whose support shifted the outcome. While minority groups largely supported Harris, shifts in Latino men and a small portion of Black male voters towards Trump compounded challenges.
- Egberto stressed the need to address misinformation campaigns, such as targeted attacks against Harris’s policies (e.g., banning menthol cigarettes), which exploited cultural touchpoints to sway key demographics.
- Democratic Strategy and the Path Forward:
- Harris’s campaign is critiqued for failing to confront the underlying biases aggressively and for not effectively communicating her achievements and policy priorities. Democrats are called out for hesitancy to “lean into perceived weaknesses” and for running campaigns reminiscent of older, outdated strategies.
- The journalists argue that Democrats must embrace more inclusive and bold messaging, directly addressing issues of race and gender while building coalitions across diverse groups. It calls for more vigorous grassroots organizing and reliance on progressive independent media to bypass mainstream narratives.
- Civic Education and Societal Challenges:
- A recurring theme is the lack of civic literacy among voters, which the authors suggest was exploited by Trump’s campaign. They call for a renewed focus on educating the electorate about governmental systems and the importance of informed decision-making.
Conclusion: Egberto and Marlon conclude on a reflective note, emphasizing that Kamala Harris’s loss is not merely a political defeat but a stark reminder of America’s ongoing struggles with racism and sexism. However, it also sees an opportunity for progressive movements to regroup, rethink strategies, and leverage independent media to counteract misinformation. The progressive movement can strive for more equitable representation and transformative policies in future elections by addressing systemic barriers and building broader coalitions.
