Christopher Pearson discusses the National Popular Vote movement, exploring its aim to make every vote count equally, create a true democracy in America, and eliminate our constitutional aberration.
Christopher Pearson on the National Vote Movement.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
Christopher Pearson, a former Vermont legislator and advocate for the National Popular Vote initiative, discusses efforts to reform the Electoral College to ensure that the presidency reflects the national popular vote. He highlights the movement’s constitutional approach, bipartisan public support, and the challenges of partisan opposition. Pearson emphasizes the importance of this reform for revitalizing democracy, increasing voter participation, and ensuring that every vote matters equally.
Key Takeaways
- Equal Representation: The National Popular Vote initiative ensures the presidency goes to the candidate with the most votes, addressing Electoral College inequities.
- Constitutional Path: States joining the compact use their constitutional authority to allocate electors based on the national popular vote.
- Broad Support: Two-thirds of Americans, including half of Republican voters, support the initiative despite organized far-right opposition.
- Nationwide Engagement: Reform would increase voter turnout and political engagement in all states, not just battlegrounds.
- Urgency for Change: The current system has led to second-place candidates winning the presidency and disproportionately shaped the judiciary, highlighting the need for reform.
Progressive Perspective
The National Popular Vote initiative is a transformative step toward a fairer, more inclusive democracy. Ensuring that every vote counts equally dismantles an outdated system prioritizing a few swing states over the voices of millions. This reform strengthens the democratic principle of majority rule and revitalizes political engagement nationwide, making it a vital cause for progressives fighting for electoral justice.
In a recent interview, former Vermont state senator Christopher Pearson discussed his work with the National Popular Vote initiative, a groundbreaking effort to address the structural inequities in the United States Electoral College system. Pearson’s insights shed light on the urgency of reforming a mechanism that has twice in recent history awarded the presidency to candidates who did not win the popular vote. His advocacy underscores the progressive belief that democracy thrives when every vote is counted equally.
The Electoral College: A Flawed System
Established in the Constitution, the United States Electoral College has long been a contentious institution. Its structure allows for a candidate to win the presidency despite losing the national popular vote, as occurred in the elections of 2000 and 2016. Pearson succinctly described the core issue: the Electoral College gives disproportionate influence to a handful of battleground states while effectively sidelining voters in deep red and deep blue states. This creates a system where presidential campaigns prioritize a few states’ concerns, ignoring most Americans.
Pearson highlighted a stark statistic: voter turnout in battleground states is 10-12% higher than in non-competitive states. This disparity illustrates how the current system dampens political engagement and alienates millions of voters. By making every vote count equally, the National Popular Vote initiative aims to reawaken political participation across the country, ensuring that candidates address the needs of all Americans.
National Popular Vote: A Constitutional Path to Reform
The National Popular Vote initiative is a pragmatic and constitutional approach to reform. It leverages the Constitution’s provision allowing states to determine their electors’ allocation. States participating in the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) agree to award their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote. The compact takes effect once states representing at least 270 electoral votes—the majority needed to win the presidency—have joined.
Pearson emphasized that the initiative is not an attempt to abolish the Electoral College but to change how it functions. Currently, 18 states and the District of Columbia, representing 209 electoral votes, have passed legislation to join the compact. With 61 additional electoral votes to activate the agreement, the path forward is clear: build coalitions, engage voters, and persuade legislatures in additional states to join.
Overcoming Challenges: A Partisan Divide
Despite its broad appeal—polls show two-thirds of Americans support the idea of electing the president by popular vote—the initiative faces significant partisan opposition. Pearson noted that the rise of the “Stop the Steal” movement and other anti-democratic rhetoric has intensified resistance among some Republican leaders. This opposition, however, does not reflect the views of many rank-and-file Republican voters, about half of whom support the concept of a national popular vote.
The entrenched opposition reveals a deeper tension in American politics. As Pearson pointed out, the far right’s resistance to the National Popular Vote reflects a desire to maintain structural advantages rather than embrace the principle of equal representation. Yet, as he eloquently stated, advocating for fairness and democracy should not be controversial. The principle is simple: the candidate who receives the most votes should win the election.
The Broader Implications of Reform
The stakes of Electoral College reform extend beyond presidential elections. Pearson highlighted how the current system shapes the judiciary, noting that five of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices were appointed by presidents who lost the popular vote. This imbalance has profound implications for issues ranging from reproductive rights to voting access, making the fight for a national popular vote a cornerstone of broader progressive efforts to strengthen democracy.
Moreover, the reform has the potential to revitalize political engagement nationwide. By making every vote matter, the National Popular Vote would encourage candidates to campaign in all 50 states, bringing attention to often overlooked issues. This shift could energize voters in historically ignored regions, fostering a more inclusive and participatory democracy.
A Call to Action
As Pearson and the National Popular Vote teamwork to secure additional states’ participation, the role of grassroots activism cannot be overstated. Voters must demand that their representatives support the compact and prioritize electoral fairness. This advocacy is especially critical in states like Michigan, where the initiative has a realistic chance of passing soon.
The National Popular Vote represents a bold and necessary step toward a more equitable democracy. Ensuring that the presidency reflects the will of the majority addresses one of the most glaring contradictions in the American political system. As Pearson aptly noted, the principle of one person, one vote is not just a cornerstone of democracy but a demand for justice that resonates across partisan lines.
For more information on the National Popular Vote initiative, visit nationalpopularvote.com.
Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.
Most Independent Progressive outlets struggle to raise the funds they need to operate, much like the smaller outlets like Politics Done Right.
Independent Media needs you
If you like what we do, please do the following!
- Become Patreon here.
- SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube Channel here.
- SUBSCRIBE to our Facebook Page here.
- SUBSCRIBE to our Podcast here.
- Support our GoFundMe equipment fund here.
- Share our blogs, podcasts, and videos.
- Consider contributing here.
Support Our Politics Done Right Store
