Foods Not Bomb activist and musician Nick Cooper visited with Politics Done Right to update us on their court fight to feed the poor in Houston.
Nick Cooper, Food not Bombs activist
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
In a recent episode of “Politics Done Right,” host Nick Cooper, a dedicated activist musician with Food Not Bombs, shared illuminating insights into the ongoing legal battles faced by the organization, renowned for its commitment to feeding the homeless and advocating for peace. Nick is a member of the music group Free Radicals (Facebook, Instagram).
Cooper’s narration of their experiences sheds light on a broader societal conflict, where the acts of compassion and community service are paradoxically entangled in legal challenges. This scenario underlines the complex dynamics between grassroots activism and municipal governance.
Food Not Bombs, as Cooper explains, operates under a simple yet profound principle: to provide vegetarian and vegan food to those in need without any monetary transactions involved. This 100% volunteer-driven initiative doesn’t just stop at addressing hunger; it’s an active statement against war and hierarchical systems. Such a stance inherently challenges the status quo, making the organization a target for those in power who view their activities as a nuisance or threat to the existing order.
The group’s legal struggles began with what Cooper describes as “tickets for violating the food sharing ordinance,” a city regulation requiring written permission for public food distribution. This stipulation led to a staggering 87 tickets issued to Food Not Bombs volunteers since March, culminating in frequent court appearances that often resulted in postponements and reschedulings. This bureaucratic tangle, as depicted by Cooper, is not just an inconvenience but a deliberate tactic to wear down the resolve of the activists.
However, a turning point in this ongoing saga emerged during a recent court proceeding. Cooper’s account of the trial reveals a judicial system grappling with its own principles. The judge, evidently frustrated with the prosecutor’s lack of preparedness, dismissed the cases against Food Not Bombs. This decision, while a temporary relief, comes with the caveat that the charges could be refiled, signaling an unending loop of legal skirmishes.
The financial implications of these legal battles are significant. Cooper mentions that settling a ticket could cost $260, but going to court could increase this to $500 per ticket, with the ordinance allowing for fines up to $2,000. This financial burden, potentially totaling $170,000, is a stark example of how punitive measures are used to dissuade civic engagement and charitable acts.
The core of the conflict, as Cooper suggests, lies not in the logistical aspects of Food Not Bombs’ operations but in the political and real estate interests that view the presence of homeless individuals as undesirable. The organization’s choice to distribute food in front of a closed public library is a strategic and symbolic act, countering the narrative that their presence creates issues like trash or disorder. In reality, as Cooper points out, Food Not Bombs is responding to a pre-existing need, providing services in a space where the city has failed.
In an intriguing twist, Cooper’s recounting of another trial highlights the public’s sympathy with the Food Not Bombs cause. A jury selection process failed to find jurors willing to enforce the food-sharing law, reflecting a broader societal recognition of the unjust nature of penalizing acts of kindness. This scenario underscores a significant disconnect between the legal system and public sentiment, where laws are increasingly out of touch with societal values and needs.
Cooper’s narration concludes with a poignant reminder of the essential role played by organizations like Food Not Bombs during crises, such as the recent freeze. Their efforts filled gaps left by the city’s inadequate response, saving lives and providing essential services. This stark contrast between the actions of grassroots organizations and the inadequacies of official responses underlines a critical issue: the necessity of reevaluating priorities and policies at the municipal level.
Nick Cooper’s experience with Food Not Bombs is a powerful example of grassroots activists’ challenges in pursuing social justice and community service. The ongoing legal battles are not just about the right to feed the homeless; they represent a broader struggle against systemic issues prioritizing property and order over compassion and human dignity. As Cooper’s story demonstrates, the fight for a more equitable and humane society is often fraught with obstacles. Still, the resilience and commitment of activists like those in Food Not Bombs offer a beacon of hope and a call to action for us all.
Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.
Most Independent Progressive outlets struggle to raise the funds they need to operate, much like the smaller outlets like Politics Done Right.
Independent Media needs you
If you like what we do, please do the following!
- Become Patreon here.
- SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube Channel here.
- SUBSCRIBE to our Facebook Page here.
- SUBSCRIBE to our Podcast here.
- Support our GoFundMe equipment fund here.
- Share our blogs, podcasts, and videos.
- Consider contributing here.
