Indivisible Houston President Daniel J. Cohen enumerates Harris County DA Kim Ogg’s corruption.

Indivisible Houston President Daniel J. Cohen continues his duty to ensure that politicians live up to their duty to the electorate. He is informing them of the misdeeds of Harris County DA Kim Ogg.

Daniel J. Cohen checks Kim Ogg

The discourse surrounding the conduct of Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, as articulated by Daniel J. Cohen, president of Indivisible Houston, paints a troubling picture of the political landscape within the jurisdiction’s justice system. Cohen’s allegations raise questions about the integrity of the DA’s office and signify a broader issue of political weaponization within the ranks of those entrusted to uphold the law impartially. The following points encapsulate the core of the concerns raised by Cohen, which necessitate a closer examination.

Cohen accuses DA Ogg of deploying her office as a tool of political retribution. This purported weaponization is claimed to manifest through a prosecutorial double standard: vigorously pursuing those who advocate for bail reform—a cause often championed by progressive Democrats—while concurrently turning a blind eye to the actions of her political allies, irrespective of their party affiliation. According to Cohen, this selective enforcement is not merely a deviation from legal norms but a calculated assault on the democratic principles of fairness and justice.

The case of Hervis Rogers is cited as a prime example of Ogg’s alleged overreach. Rogers, an elderly Black man, faced voter fraud charges for a vote he believed he was eligible to cast. The decision to escalate such a case to a grand jury, which Cohen emphasizes was not a legal necessity, is framed as an abuse of discretion. This case is emblematic of what Cohen describes as a pattern of behavior from Ogg’s office: the unnecessary and aggressive pursuit of individuals that serves more as a public spectacle than the pursuit of justice.

Cohen’s assertion that Ogg, who is noted to have previously been a Republican, has been particularly aggressive towards Democrats, especially those in strong positions, suggests a politicized agenda that transcends her current party affiliation. The implication is that Ogg’s actions are not simply the byproduct of party politics but are driven by a deeper, more insidious form of partisanship that undermines the party from within.

Cohen levels serious accusations regarding Ogg’s handling of bail reform, a key issue for the Democratic Party. He claims that Ogg has launched nonsensical investigations against reformist judges and has misrepresented the outcomes of bail reform to the public, cherry-picking data to support a narrative that aligns with the interests of law enforcement unions and other powerful entities. This, Cohen argues, is indicative of a DA acting in self-interest, not public service.

Finally, Cohen calls for public awareness and accountability. He describes Ogg as a “dangerous” DA who is “dangerously out of control.” These are strong words, indicative of a deep frustration with an official who, in his view, has consistently obstructed progressive reform and used her office to advance personal political interests at the expense of justice and democracy.

Cohen’s portrayal of DA Ogg’s tenure is one of a public servant who has allegedly strayed far from the principles of her office, engaging in conduct that betrays the trust of those she is supposed to serve. The allegations of corruption, bias, and abuse of power demand thorough investigation and response. For the health of Harris County’s democracy and justice system, it is imperative that these concerns be addressed with transparency and accountability. If the justice system is perceived as a weapon in the hands of the few rather than a shield for the many, then the very foundations of democratic governance are at risk. It falls upon the electorate, the media, and fellow public officials to ensure that these allegations are scrutinized and, if found credible, that appropriate actions are taken to restore integrity to the DA’s office.

We work extremely hard to research and seed the internet with truthful, fact-based information to counter the misinformation from the Right and others who would have us vote against our interests. Corporations and billionaires ensure the Right-Wing & MAGA are well funded. We have you, our grassroots. Please support our work today.